TreeHouse Foods: Flexibility With Efficiency

In any given category, TreeHouse's 19 manufacturing plants must make dozens of varieties in dozens of formulations, all at low cost.

By Bob Sperber, Plant Operations Editor

Share Print Related RSS

Pick a category and a leading processor in it -- say, canned soup. The leading company probably offers a dozen or two of varieties of soup, produced around the clock, 365 days a year on near-continuous lines.

Now consider the task of a private-label company trying to help its retail chain customers keep pace with as many varieties of soup. In fact, consider all of those varieties with numerous formulations. Think about that for another 15 shelf stable categories – from hot oatmeal and powdered beverage mixes to macaroni and cheese or salsa -- and numerous dry grocery products in between. Then take into account a multitude of customer labels, and you quickly arrive at the thousands and thousands of stock keeping units (SKUs) manufactured by TreeHouse Foods and its Bay Valley Foods operating subsidiary.

Private label manufacturers clearly live by different rules than the typical branded food marketer. But in some ways, its 19 plants are "aren't much different from any other company's plants with regard to the basic fundamentals," says Harry Walsh, president of Bay Valley Foods and senior vice president of corporate parent TreeHouse Foods. The principles of food safety, operational efficiency, sales and distribution are well understood and apply to all food plants.

But there are some differences that distinguish Bay Valley from national brand processors. For starters, Walsh notes, the "operational focus is on providing support and development of our customers' brands rather than our own brands."

We have process controls in many of our facilities, and we have plans to continue to move ahead with process automation and control where it makes sense.

– George Jurkovich, senior vice president of operations, Bay Valley

Brand marketers have significantly fewer formulas and SKUs to manage, giving them a great advantage in productivity and cost per unit. However, they must spend "enormous amounts of money" to support their branded goods, which helps in leveling the landscape with private labelers, Walsh says.

It's still a major challenge for a large private labeler to remain flexible enough to meet customer requirements while at the same time remaining a low-cost producer. But Walsh says the company "prides itself in trying to get very close" to big-brand levels of efficiency.

If flexibility is a critical challenge, meeting that challenge has become a "key competitive differentiator," says George Jurkovich, Bay Valley's senior vice president of operations. The company benchmarks its operational performance against the big-brand marketers, from capital spending down to production line changeover speed.

"Operationally, we compare ourselves to the branded players, but we need to make certain we have the ability to do several changeovers and start-ups a day," Jurkovich says.

This is true in processing and even more critical in packaging and labeling, where the company's competence "probably represents the biggest differentiator between us and the branded players. They may run high-speed, high-volume lines, but they are less flexible. Unlike them, we have learned to be both high-speed and flexible."

Management strategy

"Harry and George have done a phenomenal job of establishing best practices across our 19 facilities," says Sharon Flanagan, senior vice president of strategy for TreeHouse corporate. She explains this has been key to the company's growth from its roots as a collection of a few small companies.

Best practices, including selected lean manufacturing practices such as quick-changeover workshops, have proliferated as the company seeks to raise the bar "head and shoulders above the typical private-label manufacturer," she says.

Flanagan speaks from experience. Before joining TreeHouse, she consulted Fortune 100 companies as a partner with consulting firm McKinsey & Co.'s consumer packaged goods and retail practices, and before that she worked in marketing for General Mills.

"Our scale enables us to deliver category management, procurement, innovation and other skills that help us operate as a low-cost producer and a better marketing partner for our customers," she says.

Along with flexibility, Flanagan sees food safety and low-cost manufacturing as a trinity to success. For example, TreeHouse is able to invest in vision and X-ray systems that enhance safety, quality and efficiency. Fundamental goals set by corporate are reinforced by a tag-team tour every new year by Walsh and Jurkovich. The two tour each plant to re-establish goals and targets in areas such as:

  • People and system effectiveness, such as worker safety and accident audits, absenteeism and units per man-hour.
  • Food safety and quality, including quality assurance and control, first-pass quality measures and compliance to standards and regulations.
  • Production efficiency (line efficiencies, ingredient yields, schedule attainment, asset utilization, capacity and changeovers).
  • Production effectiveness, with measures from overall capacity to line efficiency, changeover improvements, ingredient yields; schedule attainment and asset utilization.

Just as Jurkovich notes how the company compares its operational performance to the top-tier branded food plants, TreeHouse holds Bay Valley to the same standard. For example, in tracking asset utilization, Flanagan says the company benchmarks its return on capital investments against those of publicly traded, branded food manufacturers. Her analyses include category-by-category comparisons of economic value added (net operating profit after taxes minus cost of capital), "which, when you think about the number of changeovers and complexity we have to deal with, is a pretty challenging target to aim for," she says.

But setting a high bar and making results visible across the company helps plant managers better understand the efficiency of their assets and inventories, which, in turn, helps them better prioritize improvement projects under their own authority.

To impart operational agility, management divides its myriad products into 16 categories, each operating as a smaller, entrepreneurial company. Each category group is managed by a multidisciplinary team responsible for corporate goals that characterize any business – sales, production, quality, innovation, warehousing, distribution and the rest. This approach brings the scale and expertise of a nearly $2 billion company to smaller, nimble teams focused around category-specific business units.

Performance enhancements
From category goals to individual plants, goals are tracked on the production line using various methods to manage information and improve plant performance.

For example, OEE – overall equipment effectiveness – has been implemented across the operation. Under this methodology, data are aggregated into a tally combining availability (operating time to planned production time), performance (loss or gain in speed) and quality (proportion of on-spec product). Production personnel check their work against these targets daily or multiple times per shift.

It's the kind of thing that engenders a "let's-beat-our-best" spirit of continuous improvement. For example, a team at Bay Valley's North Coast facility in North East, Pa., went so far as likening its efforts to a NASCAR pit crew performing lightning-fast tire changes. Dubbing their effort "Project Taladega," they cut changeover time significantly for a salad dressing line.

Such achievements require an investment in information technology in the business office and the plant floor. Yet, other than a centralized accounting system, there's no single information technology system or template beyond required reports on the fundamentals. Why?

"I've seen too many folks fail by trying to enforce a 'one-size-fits-all' approach," Walsh says. Each category group is given the autonomy it needs to run its business as it sees fit, from top-level enterprise resource planning (ERP) to machine and process control and vendor selection.

"We have process controls in many of our facilities, and we have plans to continue to move ahead with process automation and control where it makes sense," says Jurkovich. "But there's no standard system, and we don't force our plants to use one particular vendor."

There is one exception in many of Bay Valley's plants, which enables the use of tools like OEE. The system resides in the execution or "manufacturing operations" layer between front-office business systems above it and real-time machine and process controls below. Using one such system, CDC Factory software, operators access plant performance data at human-machine interface stations on the floor. Dials, numerical OEE readouts and other simple graphics help them track their performance, which in turn feeds data to business systems.

Bay Valley first implemented the system across six plants in 2008, finding the first plant project achieved full payback as the sixth was going in based on OEE gains that continue to drive efficiencies. Jurkovich has even called the system "the quickest route to capitalizing on our latent human capital potential."

When plant assets are used to their maximum effectiveness, management has the confidence to invest in expansions. They know funds are not being spent on an expansion when efficiency gains otherwise could have handled increased demand. And while there have been some plant consolidations in the Bay Valley Foods plant network, there continue to be expansions as well.

"If we have a fast-growing plant or category that requires a good deal of innovation or expansion and we have the ability through our sales, marketing, distribution and supply chain teams to grow that business, we're clearly not afraid to invest in new capacity," says Jurkovich.

In the case of Bay Valley's North Coast salad dressing plant, acquired in 2007, he says, "We had an excellent [expansion] plan developed by an entrepreneur who remains with us today. And based upon the attractiveness of the category, we decided to add a production line, which also required us to make a building addition.

And we're contemplating another, similar project in another location where we've got a great product, great quality, great innovation and a great sales and marketing team. In cases like these, we want to make the kinds of investments that allow us to continue our growth."

Walsh expects to continue fostering this growth outlook. "When we're in a category that has good growth potential and we feel we can leverage that, we'll certainly continue to invest in it."

Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

Join the discussion today. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments