Home » Interbrand's View of The Kraft-Cadbury Deal: Profits But Not Value
Interbrand's View of The Kraft-Cadbury Deal: Profits But Not Value
Interbrand.com
FoodProcessing.com
01/25/2010
With the approval of their takeover offer, Kraft is paying for the significant opportunity to create incremental profits for its shareholders. In this deal, Kraft will have several operational levers they can use to drive improvements: staff cuts, distributions synergies, marketing leverage, and procurement efficiencies to name but a few. These traditional approaches to profit enhancement are likely to breed many one time or short-term benefits. A well-run company like Kraft is likely to realize these benefits. Hence the $19bn price tag.
Interbrand, however, takes the view that it’s unlikely that the deal will dramatically create value at the product level. Brand value creation occurs when demand is generated in unique ways. Most of the Cadbury brands that come with the acquisition are well established with broad sub-brands. The Cadbury portfolio’s preeminence in the market suggests that Kraft believes that buying brands is a better bet than developing what’s currently in their pipeline, an indicator that their internal innovation may not deliver their growth objectives.
If Kraft makes the common post-M&A mistake of putting innovation on hold to focus on creating marketing efficiencies, then it’s likely that the breakthrough, demand-generating ideas that will make the deal “pay” won’t emerge. So Kraft will need to make the deal work on two fronts: efficiencies through combined operations, and effectiveness through Brand Portfolio management.
Key points on the deal to consider:
- The odds favor efficiency and may be why shrewd investors looked for the deal to have a higher commitment of cash. Paying with cash creates pressure for returns while protecting shareholder equity.
- The distinctiveness of Cadbury’s product is an opportunity for Kraft to bring new consumers to the brand through broader distribution. Portfolio management is critical in order to position brands to complement rather than compete.
More News:
-
05/20/2013
PepsiCo Stock Hits 32-Year High, but Why?
Decent first quarter but also investment firms buys a big stake.
-
05/17/2013
Happy Family Bought by Groupe Danone
Dannon parent acquires 92 percent of seven-year-old toddler food company.
-
05/15/2013
Anuga 2013: A Taste of Global Innovations Set to Take Place October 5-9
The huge global food show will be October 5-9 in Cologne, Germany.
-
05/13/2013
Vermont Passes Genetic Labeling Bill
The Vermont House of Representatives approved H.112 on May 10. The bill will go to the senate next in fall 2013. If passed, the earliest the act could become law is January 2014.
-
05/10/2013
GMO Labeling Effort Reaches Washington
Senate and House bills would require the FDA to develop regulations for the labeling of food containing bioengineered ingredients.
-
05/01/2013
Burger King CEO To Take Over at Heinz
Bernardo Hees of 3G Capital is new CEO of Pittsburgh acquisition.
-
04/26/2013
The New Hostess Company Resumes Operations
The Metropolous-Apollo-controlled company plans to reopen four plants and hire workers, but not union labor.
- 04/19/2013 Cheesemaker, Restaurant Chain Hold Mac and Cheese Cookoff
- 04/19/2013 Restaurant Chain That Also Supplies School Lunches Goes Trans Fat-Free
-
04/05/2013
$10 Billion Offer for D.E Master Blenders 1753
Former part of Sara Lee eyed by European fund Joh. A. Benckiser.
- All news »
Subscriptions
Digital Editions
Access Food Processing and Wellness Foods magazines on-line and receive an e-mail each month when your new issue is ready. Subscribe Now »
E-Newsletters
Biweekly updates delivering feature articles, top industry news, company news, product announcements, technical issues and more. Subscribe Now »
Print page