Voices: Editor's Plate

Editor's Plate: CSR Means Paying Taxes

Walgreen Co., increasingly a grocery retailer, is considering an offshore home to avoid U.S. corporate taxes.

By Dave Fusaro, Editor in Chief

“We live those values every day, as we try to reflect the vision of Charles R. Walgreen by doing what is fair and beneficial to others.”

Two quick questions up front: 1. Do you have a corporate social responsibility (CSR) report? 2. Are you selling your groceries through a large retail chain that’s considering moving its corporate headquarters offshore just to dodge U.S. taxes?

I’m speaking of Walgreen Co., based here in the suburbs of my hometown Chicago. Walgreen’s in recent years has greatly increased the floor space it devotes to groceries, not just candy and gum, and it also has a burgeoning private label business. But if it moves a nominal head office to Switzerland, I won’t be buying my Maxwell House instant coffee and Splenda there anymore. And that truly is where I buy my coffee and sweetener and many other groceries for various reasons. Sorry, Kraft and McNeil/Tate and Lyle.

I suspect I won’t be alone. Stories in the Chicago media have created a backlash against this hometown favorite, which has been filling our prescriptions since 1901. This could alienate customers across the entire country, now that Walgreen’s has a national footprint (8,678 stores in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam).

The company faces a tough choice, balancing profits against corporate social responsibility. One local news story likened this move to Walgreen’s renouncing its U.S. citizenship.

For background, Walgreen’s is in the process of acquiring the remaining 55 percent of Switzerland-based Alliance Boots, Europe’s largest pharmacy chain (it already owns 45 percent). That logical move comes with an interesting side benefit called a corporate tax inversion. By making itself in effect a subsidiary of a foreign parent, Walgreen’s can move its corporate home to low-tax Switzerland (or elsewhere in Europe). No additional bricks and mortar needed, and the well-paid execs of America’s pharmacy don’t need to buy chalets in the Alps or move there.

The only thing that changes is some paperwork.

This would save the firm millions, maybe hundreds of millions, in taxes … which presumably would be returned to shareholders in improved earnings. Except the biggest shareholders in Walgreen's are institutional investors and its own executives.

Referring back to the corporate social responsibility report: I couldn’t find one on Walgreen’s website, although they have a landing page devoted to five subtopics of that subject. Admirable stuff, like Community, Environmental Sustainability, Diversity, Supplier Diversity and Disability Inclusion. The quote at the top of this column comes from that page. Dodging taxes doesn’t sound compatible with those lofty goals.

I’m in dangerous territory here because I don’t know enough about taxes and international business dealings to make this a knockout punch. This is not a first for corporate America, although I think it is a first for a business that has this much reach into the food and beverage industry. And I always worry that the real culprits are investment firms and financial analysts, who may be unhappy with the share price – which looks pretty stellar to me.

Maybe Walgreen’s mere threat will motivate Congress to undertake a long-overdue examination of the corporate tax codes, closing some of the loopholes and maybe lowering some rates so that American firms can be profitable and competitive on a world scale. But that’s the thing: Nobody can call Walgreen’s noncompetitive. If it were, it wouldn’t be in a position to be buying Europe’s biggest pharmacy chain.

America has been good to Walgreen’s. Walgreen’s should return the favor.

More from this author...


A More Important Vote in California

Proposition 37 looks likely to ignite the GMO debate nationally.


American Medical Association's Uneducated Attitude on Salt

The AMA is battling salt. What if the organization got involved with something its members actually have proficient knowledge about? Say, infectious diseases?


Are You Doing Enough for Health?

As the recent IFT Show proved, there are plenty of healthful ingredient solutions out there.


Behavior Modification Presentation at Research Chefs Assn Conference

Tell consumers, ‘We care about your health.’ When people feel cared about, they become your most loyal customers.


Chinese Ingredients Unpopular at 2007 IFT Food Expo

The Chinese pavilion at the IFT Food Expo was like a ghost town.


Choosing Food Based on Greenhouse Gas Score a Bad Idea

Choosing food based on a greenhouse gas score is a bad idea, says Editor Dave Fusaro, in this month's Editor's Plate column.


Corn-Based Ethanol an Unexpected Obstacle to Sustainability

In addition to driving up food prices, corn-based ethanol is standing in the way of developing other alternative fuels.


Corn-Based Ethanol Raises Ingredient Prices

It’s amazing to see how $3-a-gallon gasoline finally has set off a frenzy to find alternatives to oil, not just here in the U.S. but around the world. Will we someday be competing with our own SUVs for food?


Do They Want Healthier Food or Not?

In his monthly column, Editor's Plate, Dave Fusaro sounds off: Cheerios may have gone too far, but a ‘new’ FDA should focus on safety and health.


Don't be Guilty of Greenwashing

Deceptive efforts deserve criticism; but let us know about your best efforts to save the planet.


Donating Product to Second Harvest is a Win-Win

It’s a win-win-win. What better way to move unsalables, get a tax benefit and help hungry people?


Don’t Buy Sustainability from Walmart

Credit the big retailer with jump-starting a unified green effort, but the food & beverage industry should be the driver.


Editor's Plate: 2010 Was a Pretty Good Year

A toast to a surprisingly good 2010, with fingers crossed for 2011.


Editor's Plate: A Littler Joint Venture: Me & Goji

Alexander and Adam let you design your own cereal … and container.


Editor's Plate: A Load of Benjamins ... and One Larry

...and an Irene, too. Even as the 'average' food industry salary breaks $100k, how does the CEO of Smithfield Foods warrant $12.9 million.


Editor's Plate: A Wild Ride Ahead

In a month of financial wrangling, a salute to the small food and beverage companies.


Editor's Plate: All Things in Moderation

Create low- (but not no-) calorie beverages (and other food products) without fear of failing.


Editor's Plate: Another American Processor Sells Out

I thought I was a free-marketeer, but this Smithfield deal bothers me.


Editor's Plate: Another Reason To Hate Wall Street

Who's Nelson Peltz to tell PepsiCo how to run a food and beverage business?


Editor's Plate: Breaking Up Is Not So Hard To Do

The current frenzy of split-up activity is just the circle of life in the food & beverage industry.