Voices: Editor's Plate

Editor's Plate: To GMO or not to GMO

Are consumers not interested or is it too soon to tell?

By Dave Fusaro, Editor in Chief

It may be a difficult process, but everybody knows removing genetically engineered ingredients (GMOs) is what all consumers want and is the fast-track to soaring sales, right?

Not so fast.

We trumpeted "Cheerios Now GMO-Free" in a headline online in January and in our February print issue. Now, three months – admittedly only three months – into the new formulation for its iconic cereal, General Mills Inc. sees no pickup in sales and sounds like it's questioning the rationale behind this move.

In a phone interview in late March with the Associated Press, Chairman and CEO Kenneth Powell said the company has received good press, supportive letters and positive online comments for its decision -- but no incremental sales.

"It's what I expected," Powell told the AP. He said he was "not really seeing anything there that we can detect" in terms of a sales improvement. And the news organization paraphrased him as saying he believes genetically modified organisms aren't really a concern for most customers.

General Mills started shipping only its plain-formula Cheerios without GMOs in January. A spokesman explained the oats part was easy – he said there are no GMO oats in this country – but the company had to find non-GMO sources of corn starch and cane sugar.

Post Foods followed up with a Non-GMO Project-certified version of Grape-Nuts.

Regular Cheerios seemed like a logical product to try this out on, since its consumer base seems to be concerned mothers, especially ones feeding the cereal by hand to toddlers.

The other versions of Cheerios were unchanged. And from the very start, General Mills said it had no immediate plans to reformulate other cereals.

Big G used a low-key approach in the rollout, not really trumpeting the change – although it did get noticed by traditional and social media. AP said the reformulation came after a campaign by the group Green America, which prompted fans to express their support on the Cheerios' Facebook page.

After the change, Green America noted with some disdain General Mills did not obtain third-party verification, such as from the Non-GMO Project, for its claim.

So maybe General Mills did not give this marketing-inspired product change its all. Maybe the reformulation needed a little more time than just three months to be written off. The company could have, maybe should have, gotten official Non-GMO Project certification. It could have made a very big marketing splash over the change – which, however, would have cast doubts on the safety of its other cereals, which presumably have genetically engineered ingredients.

Nevertheless, the results are as unimpressive as they are inconclusive. Pretty much nothing has changed. Every food processor, those on either side of the GMO fence, still must weigh the logic of going GMO-free for their products, their markets, their consumers.

Capital spending way up

Another great feature of this month's issue is our annual Capital Spending Report. Capital expenditures are an interesting barometer of the health of the food and beverage industry, and it's encouraging to see our report this year predicting a 15 percent increase in the aggregate figure – at least for the 37 companies for which we have solid figures.

They may be only 37 companies, but they're 37 of the largest companies in the food & beverage industry. And collectively they account for $18.5 billion in capital spend.

The numbers are encouraging, and the hot product categories and other trends that are driving this investment should be noted by all food and beverage processors.

More from this author...

Title

A More Important Vote in California

Proposition 37 looks likely to ignite the GMO debate nationally.

10/09/2012

American Medical Association's Uneducated Attitude on Salt

The AMA is battling salt. What if the organization got involved with something its members actually have proficient knowledge about? Say, infectious diseases?

07/01/2006

Are You Doing Enough for Health?

As the recent IFT Show proved, there are plenty of healthful ingredient solutions out there.

09/01/2005

Behavior Modification Presentation at Research Chefs Assn Conference

Tell consumers, ‘We care about your health.’ When people feel cared about, they become your most loyal customers.

06/01/2005

Chinese Ingredients Unpopular at 2007 IFT Food Expo

The Chinese pavilion at the IFT Food Expo was like a ghost town.

09/04/2007

Choosing Food Based on Greenhouse Gas Score a Bad Idea

Choosing food based on a greenhouse gas score is a bad idea, says Editor Dave Fusaro, in this month's Editor's Plate column.

10/04/2007

Corn-Based Ethanol an Unexpected Obstacle to Sustainability

In addition to driving up food prices, corn-based ethanol is standing in the way of developing other alternative fuels.

05/19/2008

Corn-Based Ethanol Raises Ingredient Prices

It’s amazing to see how $3-a-gallon gasoline finally has set off a frenzy to find alternatives to oil, not just here in the U.S. but around the world. Will we someday be competing with our own SUVs for food?

09/01/2006

Do They Want Healthier Food or Not?

In his monthly column, Editor's Plate, Dave Fusaro sounds off: Cheerios may have gone too far, but a ‘new’ FDA should focus on safety and health.

05/29/2009

Don't be Guilty of Greenwashing

Deceptive efforts deserve criticism; but let us know about your best efforts to save the planet.

09/05/2008

Donating Product to Second Harvest is a Win-Win

It’s a win-win-win. What better way to move unsalables, get a tax benefit and help hungry people?

10/01/2005

Don’t Buy Sustainability from Walmart

Credit the big retailer with jump-starting a unified green effort, but the food & beverage industry should be the driver.

09/14/2009

Editor's Plate: 2010 Was a Pretty Good Year

A toast to a surprisingly good 2010, with fingers crossed for 2011.

01/08/2011

Editor's Plate: A Littler Joint Venture: Me & Goji

Alexander and Adam let you design your own cereal … and container.

03/14/2011

Editor's Plate: A Load of Benjamins ... and One Larry

...and an Irene, too. Even as the 'average' food industry salary breaks $100k, how does the CEO of Smithfield Foods warrant $12.9 million.

07/09/2013

Editor's Plate: All Things in Moderation

Create low- (but not no-) calorie beverages (and other food products) without fear of failing.

03/14/2012

Editor's Plate: Another American Processor Sells Out

I thought I was a free-marketeer, but this Smithfield deal bothers me.

06/17/2013

Editor's Plate: Another Reason To Hate Wall Street

Who's Nelson Peltz to tell PepsiCo how to run a food and beverage business?

08/15/2013

Editor's Plate: Breaking Up Is Not So Hard To Do

The current frenzy of split-up activity is just the circle of life in the food & beverage industry.

08/02/2012

Editor's Plate: Care Where Your Products Are Sold

Think hard about whether your creation belongs in a hardware supercenter or a dollar store.

03/05/2010