Voices: Editor's Plate

Editor's Plate: CSR Means Paying Taxes

Walgreen Co., increasingly a grocery retailer, is considering an offshore home to avoid U.S. corporate taxes.

By Dave Fusaro, Editor in Chief

“We live those values every day, as we try to reflect the vision of Charles R. Walgreen by doing what is fair and beneficial to others.”

Two quick questions up front: 1. Do you have a corporate social responsibility (CSR) report? 2. Are you selling your groceries through a large retail chain that’s considering moving its corporate headquarters offshore just to dodge U.S. taxes?

I’m speaking of Walgreen Co., based here in the suburbs of my hometown Chicago. Walgreen’s in recent years has greatly increased the floor space it devotes to groceries, not just candy and gum, and it also has a burgeoning private label business. But if it moves a nominal head office to Switzerland, I won’t be buying my Maxwell House instant coffee and Splenda there anymore. And that truly is where I buy my coffee and sweetener and many other groceries for various reasons. Sorry, Kraft and McNeil/Tate and Lyle.

I suspect I won’t be alone. Stories in the Chicago media have created a backlash against this hometown favorite, which has been filling our prescriptions since 1901. This could alienate customers across the entire country, now that Walgreen’s has a national footprint (8,678 stores in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam).

The company faces a tough choice, balancing profits against corporate social responsibility. One local news story likened this move to Walgreen’s renouncing its U.S. citizenship.

For background, Walgreen’s is in the process of acquiring the remaining 55 percent of Switzerland-based Alliance Boots, Europe’s largest pharmacy chain (it already owns 45 percent). That logical move comes with an interesting side benefit called a corporate tax inversion. By making itself in effect a subsidiary of a foreign parent, Walgreen’s can move its corporate home to low-tax Switzerland (or elsewhere in Europe). No additional bricks and mortar needed, and the well-paid execs of America’s pharmacy don’t need to buy chalets in the Alps or move there.

The only thing that changes is some paperwork.

This would save the firm millions, maybe hundreds of millions, in taxes … which presumably would be returned to shareholders in improved earnings. Except the biggest shareholders in Walgreen's are institutional investors and its own executives.

Referring back to the corporate social responsibility report: I couldn’t find one on Walgreen’s website, although they have a landing page devoted to five subtopics of that subject. Admirable stuff, like Community, Environmental Sustainability, Diversity, Supplier Diversity and Disability Inclusion. The quote at the top of this column comes from that page. Dodging taxes doesn’t sound compatible with those lofty goals.

I’m in dangerous territory here because I don’t know enough about taxes and international business dealings to make this a knockout punch. This is not a first for corporate America, although I think it is a first for a business that has this much reach into the food and beverage industry. And I always worry that the real culprits are investment firms and financial analysts, who may be unhappy with the share price – which looks pretty stellar to me.

Maybe Walgreen’s mere threat will motivate Congress to undertake a long-overdue examination of the corporate tax codes, closing some of the loopholes and maybe lowering some rates so that American firms can be profitable and competitive on a world scale. But that’s the thing: Nobody can call Walgreen’s noncompetitive. If it were, it wouldn’t be in a position to be buying Europe’s biggest pharmacy chain.

America has been good to Walgreen’s. Walgreen’s should return the favor.

More from this author...


Editor's Plate: Breaking Up Is Not So Hard To Do

The current frenzy of split-up activity is just the circle of life in the food & beverage industry.


Editor's Plate: Green, Sustainable, Good

Take the time to assess your company's sustainability efforts.


Editor's Plate: The Food Industry Responds to Fighting Back

Food Processing readers respond to our May cover story, The Food Industry Fights Back


Editor's Plate: Did Ben and Jerry Change the World?

Two tie-dyed hippies may have set the stage for today's corporate social responsibility efforts.


Editor's Plate: Colorado's Cottage Foods Act

Is it an incubator for entrepreneurship or a recipe for disaster?


Editor's Plate: All Things in Moderation

Create low- (but not no-) calorie beverages (and other food products) without fear of failing.


Editor's Plate: We Both Had a Pretty Good Year

2011 was kind to the food & beverage industry and to us. Let's both keep that head of steam going into 2012.


Editor's Plate: Heinz, Naturally

Another champion from Pittsburgh! 57 or so reasons why the not-just-ketchup company was a standout in 2011.


Editor's Plate: Time to Remember Feeding America

Especially as the holidays approach; some of the benefits are yours.


Editor's Plate: Where's the FDA's New Funding?

The Food Safety Modernizaton Act has become one of the victims of feuding in Washington. Is good enough good enough?


Editor's Plate: The Triple Bottom Line

Should your CFO be your company’s sustainability watchdog?


Editor's Plate: Salts Gets in Some Licks

But don't rush to judgment on either side of the sodium debate.


Editor's Plate: Time to End the Ethanol Insanity

The food vs. fuel debate is tipping our way; don't let the momentum die.


Editor's Plate: What Makes for a Great Trade Show?

Some are succeeding, some failing. You ought to go to New Orleans next month to make IFT Food Expo a success.


Editor's Plate: People Have to Eat, Processors Ought To Build

Optimism runs rampant in our Annual Capital Spending Report.


Editor's Plate: A Littler Joint Venture: Me & Goji

Alexander and Adam let you design your own cereal … and container.


Editor's Plate: Some CEOs Come and Go, Some Don't

Hormel is a study in stability … and success.


Editor's Plate: 2010 Was a Pretty Good Year

A toast to a surprisingly good 2010, with fingers crossed for 2011.


Editor's Plate: Private Label vs. Brands

The rise of private label can only mean brands will raise their game.


Editor's Plate: It's Been a Crazy 70 Years

For our anniversary, we take a fun look back at the recent history of food.