Home » Articles » Regulatory Issues

Voices: Regulatory Issues

New Lighting Regulations for Food Processors in 2012

The Department of Energy phases out incandescent, other bulbs for energy efficiency.

By Food Processing staff

With the start of the new year come new lighting regulations from the U.S. Dept. of Energy. Part of the energy efficiency legislation includes a mandated end to domestic manufacturing of non-efficient lighting and related products. This will change the way facilities consume energy and maintain lighting.

"There are plenty of myths out there that are causing some confusion and ambiguity surrounding the legislation, which could end up putting some businesses at a disadvantage," said John McDermott, brand strategy manager-sustainability at W.W. Grainger Inc., Lake Forest, Ill. "The lighting legislation is a unique opportunity for businesses to be more financially and operationally efficient, and facilities should embrace this shift and reap the benefits."

McDermott lists seven myths surrounding the lighting legislation and outlines some tools and resources that can help businesses ease into the transition.

Myth 1: The legislation won't impact commercial businesses as much as it will impact consumers.

Fact: The legislation will impact both residential and commercial buildings … and soon. Effective Jan. 1, 2012, standard 100W bulbs will require an increase of 30-percent in efficiency and can no longer be manufactured in the U.S. The requirements will also apply to 75W (effective 2013), 60W and 40W (effective 2014). For fluorescent tubes and PAR (parabolic aluminized reflector) bulbs, lighting that is found throughout most commercial buildings, the legislation is slated to go into effect on July 14, 2012.

Myth 2: The only monetary return your business will get from making the switch to efficient lighting is the decrease in energy use.

Fact: While energy and productivity savings from efficient bulbs are an obvious monetary benefit, businesses can take advantage of utility rebates that may be available at the state and local levels for additional savings. To find out what incentives are available in your area, visit http://www.dsireusa.org, which lists information on state, local, utility and federal incentives and policies that promote renewable energy and energy efficiency.

Myth 3: All lighting within a commercial facility will require costly retrofits to accommodate the shape and design of energy-efficient lighting.

Fact: While a significant amount of lighting that is unique to a commercial building, such as fluorescent tubes and PAR bulbs, will need some kind of retrofit, not all types of lighting will require a full modification. Halogen and incandescent bulbs, for example, can simply be replaced by newer technology, such as CFL and LED bulbs, with no retrofit required.

Myth 4: Making the switch to energy-efficient LED lighting is very expensive and will put a financial strain on your business.

Fact: While LED lighting is more costly than its inefficient counterparts at the onset of installation, the return over time can be significant. Not only can your business experience the cost savings that come with reduced energy consumption, productivity levels also may increase as you will not have to maintain lighting as frequently, due to the longer lifespan of LED replacement bulbs. No-cost resources are available to help you understand the savings potential for your business, such as savings calculators and estimators found at www.grainger.com/legislation.

Myth 5: There is no rush to accommodate the legislation because you can stock up on your current inefficient lighting and wait until you run out -- waiting will not add additional costs to your project.

Fact: Like government incentive programs, the utility rebates will not be available indefinitely. To help businesses prepare for the change, many lighting manufacturers and suppliers will be running promotions and other incentives to purchase energy-efficient lighting, which, similar to government incentives, may not be available once consumers and businesses adapt to the legislation and efficient lighting becomes standard. When updating the lighting in your facility, consider taking an approach that will align with your budget and comfort level. For example, start by identifying and changing out those bulbs that do not require a retrofit.

Myth 6: When evaluating lighting within your facility and determining the best way to approach the process, you are on your own.

Fact: While some facilities may have an in-house expert who is familiar with upgrading to energy-efficient lighting, many businesses do not know where to start. There are third parties that specialize in retrofitting and can identify the magnitude of potential savings, lay out a plan for the project and even execute the installation and apply for the appropriate utility rebates. Such a partner is Alliance Energy Solutions (http://www.alliance-energy.net), a Grainger company, which assists facilities in adapting to the lighting legislation and helps businesses maximize their energy savings.

Myth 7: The best way to dispose of inefficient fluorescent lighting is just to toss it in the trash.

Fact: Because florescent bulbs contain mercury, they may pose an environmental hazard when disposed of improperly. The best way to dispose of inefficient lighting is through recycling. If there are no recycling centers or drop-off locations in your area, you can purchase pre-labeled recycling kits that allow you to mail used bulbs to recycling centers to ensure proper disposal.

For more information about the lighting legislation and how your business can prepare for the impending changes, visit www.grainger.com/legislation.

---

More Voices

New Lighting Regulations for Food Processors in 2012
12/07/2011
The Department of Energy phases out incandescent, other bulbs for energy efficiency.

Regulatory Compliance: Imports Now Under Greater Scrutiny
05/19/2011
The new Food Safety Modernization Act and PREDICT mean tougher qualifications.

Some health claims in jeopardy
02/15/2008
FDA is re-evaluating health claims for soy, antioxidant vitamins and fat-cancer.

Regulatory Issues: New rules on reporting contamination
11/16/2007
Manufacturers will not have the option of handing recalls quietly. Information may even appear on FDA’s web site.

Regulatory Issues: Navigating the health claim maze
09/04/2007
FDA’s recent guidance focuses only on the process for evaluating evidence supporting a health claim.

Regulatory Issues: Aspartame gets scrutinized again
08/08/2007
The sweetener is the most scrutinized food additive present in the diet. Regulatory bodies around the world have agreed many times on its safety.

Regulatory Issues: Labeling reconsidered for irradiated foods
06/18/2007
Irradiation may not eliminate food poisoning, but it would be a big step in the right direction.

Regulatory Issues: Atkins put to the test
05/07/2007
Nutrition is complicated. It’s not a bad thing to question the science underlying conventional wisdom.

Wellness Foods' Regulatory Issues: It’s a Natural
04/03/2007
A “natural” claim for foods is still subject to uncertainty over standards.

Regulatory Issues: Trans fat tipping point
03/05/2007
For better or for worse, there seems to be no real, ongoing scientific debate about whether trans fats are truly dangerous.

Regulatory Issues: Food Allergen Update
02/07/2007
At the end of 2006, FDA issued Edition 4 of its Food Allergen Guidance for Industry.

Regulatory Issues: Democrats eye regulatory changes
02/01/2007
We may see the creation of a Food Safety Administration, taking all food safety activities from FDA, USDA and EPA.

Regulatory Issues: FDA considers functional foods
01/09/2007
Existing requirements for functional foods meet a very high standard; any additional requirements would exceed FDA’s statutory authority.

Regulatory Issues: A tiny bit of regulation
10/23/2006
In addition to questions about how FDA will address food nanotechnology is the question of consumer acceptance. Hopefully, we will not see a repeat of the war against genetically modified foods.

Regulatory Issues: Regulatory Roundup
09/28/2006
As the legislative year grinds to a halt, here’s what’s left – and what will be on the table when things pick up again.

Regulatory Issues: FDA reports on allergen contamination
09/27/2006
If the food industry continues to show awareness of the dangers of food allergens, FDA and Congress likely will continue with a measured and deliberative approach.

Regulatory Issues: Guard against intentional contamination
09/06/2006
The food industry is fortunate Congress and FDA have not developed more specific requirements for food security.

Regulatory Issues: Food Safety Warnings
09/06/2006
Two developments regarding the preemption of state food safety warnings the food industry should know.

Regulatory Issues: Opportunities and challenges of functional ingredients
08/07/2006
Common use in dietary supplements simply does not go far toward establishing GRAS status for a functional ingredient’s use in conventional foods.

Regulatory Issues: EU rules on health claims take a step forward
06/30/2006
Ten years in the works, the European Parliament’s review of health and nutrition claims on food labels may end a longstanding prohibition against claims relating to human diseases.

Regulatory Issues: Self-Regulation of Advertising to Children
06/29/2006
Emotions run high when it comes to advertising to kids, but processors have an alphabet soup of tools for enacting voluntary regulations.

Regulatory Issues: Trade lawyers descend on Codex
06/01/2006
No longer the province of food scientists, Codex meetings and standards play a role in the resolution of trade disputes.

Regulatory Issues: FDA may cut food-contact program
05/21/2006
The agency’s proposed budget may mean an end to the efficient and speedy Food Contact Notification Program … and two- to five-year waits for reviews.

Regulatory Issues: Marketing Products Using the Dietary Guidelines
04/04/2006
Companies must ensure that any marketing use of the guidelines is truthful and not misleading within the total context.

Questionable new tactics from the Food Police
03/29/2006
The Center for Science in the Public Interest assumes incorrectly there is no room in a healthy diet for enjoyable foods.

Regulatory Issues: FDA Denies Petition on Whole Grain Descriptors
02/23/2006
Currently, hundreds of products are marketed with “whole grain” statements, despite ambiguity concerning the regulatory status of descriptors such as “good” and “excellent” source.

Regulatory Issues: Modernization of food GMPs
01/31/2006
Most of the modernization opportunities involve written documentation or recordkeeping, suggesting FDA wants to enforce the food GMP regulations efficiently.

Regulatory Issues: Bioterrorism recordkeeping essentials
12/19/2005
This month, FDA expects food companies to start “one-up, one-down” recordkeeping.

Regulatory Issues: Natural acrylamide in food faces FDA scrutiny
12/06/2005
Are warnings for acrylamide in foods informative, premature or preempted?

Regulatory Issues: FDA Accepts Use of Existing Labels
11/01/2005
The FDA has agreed to accept requests by processors to use existing labels after the trans fat labeling effective date.

Regulatory Issues: A proposed rule is not a final rule
09/23/2005
FDA recently confirmed its reversal on “and/or” wording in ingredient statements.

Synthetic Organics Out
09/01/2005
As a result of a recent federal court decision, the use of synthetic substances in processed organic products will be restricted in the future.

Regulatory Issues: Uncertainty of allergen thresholds
08/29/2005
Unfortunately, science does not allow us to know with certainty that a particular allergenic protein will not cause a single reaction in the entire population of sensitive individuals at a given level of exposure.

Regulatory Issues: Progress on health claims in Europe
06/28/2005
Proposals look similar to what we have in the U.S; differences reflect a greater degree of skepticism toward health claims in Europe.

Regulatory Issues: What’s in a name?
06/27/2005
FDA and USDA propose new principles for food standards of identity.

Regulatory Issues: Serving up whole grains
04/04/2005
With consumers increasingly aware of the benefits of whole grains, a simple, factual statement about their presence is enough.

Regulatory Issues: Obesity Report In, Allergens Out
03/01/2005
The Obesity Working Group Report confirms calories are what count when it comes to healthy eating.

Regulatory Issues: The FDA agenda for 2005
12/28/2004
It’s not good when FDA’s scientists are demoralized and the agency stands accused of being too friendly with a regulated industry.

Regulatory Issues: COOL rules finally issued
10/07/2004
The country of origin law applies only to commodities, not processed foods.

Regulatory Issues: FDA weighs labeling changes
05/30/2004
One issue is if food packages that can be reasonably consumed at one time need to declare the whole package as a single serving.

Regulatory Issues: E.U. issues new GMO regulations
12/15/2003
The new rules may represent a step forward -- and the most that any proponent of genetically modified foods can realistically hope for

Regulatory Issues: COOL reception for country-of-origin labeling
11/15/2003
Retailers may ask suppliers to guarantee the information is correct and/or indemnify the retailer in the event of an enforcement action

Regulatory Issues: Science and food safety
07/15/2003
NAS criteria pinpoint dangers and may prompt new legislative authority for feds

Regulatory Issues: Security, safety and efficiency
05/15/2003
Two years ago, no one could have predicted that food security would so dominate FDA's priorities for 2003 and beyond