Slicing, Dicing, and Shredding Equipment Add Up to Yield Improvements

Size reduction machinery may appear unchanged, but advancements under the hood result in process improvements.

By Kevin T. Higgins, Managing Editor

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page

Planned obsolescence is a sales concept reserved for consumer goods. In the world of industrial equipment, durability usually is a given, and a well-constructed machine should continue to perform long after the person who originally bought it has retired.

That’s certainly the case with machines that slice, dice and pulverize food products and raw materials. Heavy duty and industrially hardened, this equipment class takes a licking and keeps on ticking.

The bigger, faster, cheaper mantra doesn’t define the incremental improvements in these machines. Greater precision, for example, that reduces waste and improves yield characterizes the advances in many machines. Tool-less disassembly for cleaning and sanitizing that takes less time and is more thorough is attractive to virtually all food processors. And with consumption trends constantly shifting and new opportunities arising, the flexibility to produce a range of products is highly desirable.

In an in-plant trial, a Carruthers AE 5000 dicer with large diameter, low-speed gang blades and a slicing blade for perpendicular cuts didn’t dice any more chicken breast than an older two-dimensional dicer outfitted with circular gang blades for lengthwise cuts and blades mounted to a drum for cross cuts. However, the AE 5000 diced with considerably more precision and fewer fines.

Besides producing more visually appealing chunks of chicken, 93.4 percent of the newer machine’s throughput was in the 8-16mm (0.31-0.62 in.) range, compared to 75.8 percent of the older unit’s. The plant processed 5 tons of poultry product per hour, making a reduction in out-of-spec finished goods a big contributor to a better bottom line.

“People are always looking for something bigger, faster, more sanitary,” allows Mike Jacko, vice president-applications and new product innovations for Urschel Laboratories Inc. (www.urschel.com), Chesterton, Ind. Urschel engineers checked those three boxes when designing the SL-14, a 14-station slicer that replaces as the company’s new standard a machine that has sliced potato chips and other products since the 1960s.

Fourteen slicing stations are better than eight, and the new machine doubles the throughput of the older unit, but engineers also wanted to address production issues like maintenance. “If you’re running dirty potatoes, it’s normal for people to change over knives three or four times a shift,” says Jacko. Rocks and sand can destroy a machine’s knives, and replacing them typically takes two hours, he adds. A quick-clamping system and release levers in the new machine enable operators to replace a knife in approximately 2 seconds instead of 1-2 minutes.

Cutting and shredding cheese is another application for the SL-14. Hardness varies considerably, depending on the type of cheese being shredded. Soft European-style cheeses are easy to shred, but European cheese makers want “homestyle-look cuts, which are harder to do,” Jacko says. “It’s a bigger challenge than a consistent cut” and requires multiple passes.

Efforts to create an artisanal look in a mass-produced product isn’t limited to cheese. Sausage makers also are producing links with a butcher-style look in high volumes. To create that look and improved mouthfeel, some are reintroducing bowl cutters upstream of grinders and stuffers.

The Seydelmann vacuum cutter typically creates a homogenous emulsion, with vacuum removing oxygen to increase density and extend shelf life. By removing some of the blades and modulating the speed, “we can get a more gentle cutting motion, as opposed to a squeezing, brute force approach,” explains Joseph Ascoli, a chef with Reiser Corp. (www.reiser.com), a Canton, Mass., food equipment fabricator that includes the Seydelmann line in its portfolio.

“We’re doing a particle reduction in the bowl cutter and still using an in-line grinder before the stuffer,” continues Ascoli. “The result is a homestyle look with the best possible mouthfeel because all the muscle fibers are aligned.”

The core technology is old, he adds, but understanding of the machines’ capabilities and the ability to manipulate outcomes continues to grow.

Optimal bacon slicing

People might prefer one thickness of bacon over another, but the only variable of interest to processors is optimal yield. No two hog bellies are exactly alike, and engineers at Provisur Technologies Inc. (www.provisur.com), Mokena, Ill., focused on hardware and software improvements to get the most slices out of each belly when they overhauled the firm’s Cashin Edge machine in 2012.

Physical changes included extending the lower infeed conveyor, which used to stop several inches short of the slicing blade, to the edge of the blade, improving control of the meat and one or two more slices per belly. Servo drives replaced motor-driven timing belts, further improving control. More importantly, a laser sensor that maps the topography of the belly and feeds data to controls that adjust the blade profile accordingly enabled higher operating speeds, according to Brian Sandberg, global product manager-slicers.

1 of 2 < 1 | 2 View on one page
Show Comments
Hide Comments

Join the discussion

We welcome your thoughtful comments.
All comments will display your user name.

Want to participate in the discussion?

Register for free

Log in for complete access.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments