The Washington Post’s Q&A with FDA, Reduced to 250 Words

The Post’s editorial board talked to Robert Califf and Janet Woodcock about changes coming to the food safety agency.
Jan. 11, 2023
2 min read

The Washington Post editorial board got FDA’s two top officers—Commissioner Robert Califf and Principal Deputy Commissioner Janet Woodcock—to sit down for a food safety-focused Q&A on Jan. 6. They talked about last year’s baby formula crisis, culture and morale within the agency and the suggested restructuring of the FDA.

We think the biggest bullet point: Califf said they’re “weeks away” from announcing some kind of restructuring of FDA. You might want to read the unabridged version yourself — all 2000 words of it (might require a subscription) — but we’ve reduced it to about 250 here, with just a little interpretation:

WaPo: Should the FDA be broken up so there is a separate human food agency?

(After 400 words) Califf & Woodcock: That’s not our call to make.

WaPo: If we don’t break up the FDA, then how can we ensure there is true reform in the human food division after years of problems?

(After 1000 words) Califf: “We are coalescing on a plan.” “We are a couple of weeks away from announcing [a proposed new] architecture.”

“Almost 100 percent of what’s in the [Reagan-Udall Foundation] report is quite good. Actually operationalizing it is a different kind of work that takes into account a lot of ‘sausage making.’ ”

“… [about] the report’s reference to ‘constant turmoil.’ The FDA as a whole is always in constant turmoil because we’re making thousands of decisions a month that affect a lot of people. A high proportion of those decisions make somebody unhappy, and it’s stressful.”

WaPo: What else needs to be done to modernize food safety? / Most Americans probably think you already have access to all the data you need.

Califf: “When there’s a shortage [of baby formula, for example], we have to go begging for data. Legally, we can’t get the data unless they agree to give it to us. Similarly, with the states [state food safety inspections and programs], if we give them data and they make it publicly available, we’re liable.”

OUR SUMMARY: No great revelations, but they seem to be working on it. And they did promise “We are a couple of weeks away from announcing [a proposed new] architecture.”

About the Author

Dave Fusaro

Editor in Chief

Dave Fusaro has served as editor in chief of Food Processing magazine since 2003. Dave has 30 years experience in food & beverage industry journalism and has won several national ASBPE writing awards for his Food Processing stories. Dave has been interviewed on CNN, quoted in national newspapers and he authored a 200-page market research report on the milk industry. Formerly an award-winning newspaper reporter who specialized in business writing, he holds a BA in journalism from Marquette University. Prior to joining Food Processing, Dave was Editor-In-Chief of Dairy Foods and was Managing Editor of Prepared Foods.

Sign up for our eNewsletters
Get the latest news and updates