Industry Trends: Store Brands Cap a Decade of Growth

As shoppers' economic concerns eased somewhat in the wake of the recession, some industry observers predicted that store brands would give up their recent gains, or even decline as the economy rebounded.

By Diane Toops, News & Trends Editor

Share Print Related RSS

Store brands, as mentioned in our article Food Processors Find Public Growth for Private Label (www.foodprocessing.com/articles/2011/private-label.html) capped a decade of powerful growth by posting sales increases across all three of the major retail channels in 2010 and pushing dollar market share to new all-time highs in supermarkets, drug stores and total outlets, according to PLMA's 2011 Private Label Yearbook, which tracks private label sales and market share trends based on data from The Nielsen Co.

As shoppers' economic concerns eased somewhat in the wake of the recession, some industry observers predicted that store brands would give up their recent gains, or even decline as the economy rebounded. The expectation proved without foundation, however, and the return to some kind of pre-recession status quo eluded the national brands. To the contrary, store brands held onto the gains and even built on them.

Sales of store brands saw gains of more than 2 percent in U.S. supermarkets and nearly 5 percent in drug chains. Over the past decade, annual sales of private label products have increased by 40 percent in supermarkets and by 96 percent in drug stores.

In total outlets – comprised of U.S. supermarkets, drug stores and mass merchandisers, including Walmart – store brand sales increased by nearly 2 percent while dollar share advanced by almost half a point to a new record level. Overall, sales were $88.5 billion, another all-time high, according to The Nielsen Co.

Store brands share of dollar sales advanced to a record 19.1 percent in supermarkets, and unit market share was 23.5 percent. In drug stores, store brands advanced in dollar share to 14.7 percent and recorded unit share of 16.2 percent. For Total outlets, store brands dollar share rose to 17.4 percent and unit share came in at 21.8 percent.

While the sales totals are impressive, a comprehensive figure for private label food and non-food grocery sales in the U.S. would without a doubt be even more so. An estimated $15 to $20 billion in additional private label sales in channels that are not reporting to the Nielsen databases, such as warehouse clubs, limited assortment stores, convenience stores and dollar stores would likely have produced a grand total exceeding $100 billion for 2010.

The data also offer evidence of extreme efforts by national brand marketers in 2010 to recapture some of the market share they lost to store brands over the previous years. In particular, elevated promotional spending and short-term price cuts by national brands may have hedged the erosion of unit sales at the cost of any and all growth when it came to dollar sales. Indeed, it was highly unusual, if not unprecedented, that in supermarkets national brands were negative (minus 0.1 percent) in year-to-year dollar sales, while their unit sales were up a by modest 1 percent.

An analysis of dollar sales and unit sales is instructive. Store brands contributed mightily – indeed, out of proportion to their relative size in the market – to the increases of sales volume in the channels last year. Moreover, the spread between dollar sales performance of private label and national brands was significant.

In supermarkets, store brands sales increased by $1.2 billion and accounted for 100 percent of the growth in the channel, even offsetting a sales drop of -$149 million by national brands. The picture was much the same in drug stores, where store brands dollar sales increased by $300 million, comprising 60 percent of incremental revenue in the channel.

Looking at Total outlets, the results were even more dramatic – private label was up $1.5 billion while national brands were down $4.6 billion, a spread of fully $6.1 billion in sales revenue.

When it came to units sold, national brands in supermarkets gained one percent while store brands were essentially flat, indicating that national brands likely relied heavily on price reductions and other inducements to shoppers to move their goods at any cost. In drug chairs, private label units were off marginally and national brands were even. In Total outlets, store brands gave up -0.9 percent in units and national brands lost -0.6 percent. Whether such moves by national brands can be sustainable practices in terms of their bottom lines will be a development to watch during 2011.

It's not surprising that store brands held their ground after recording sales surges the past few years. Recessions often force consumers to test new purchasing habits. What occurs, in effect, is a large-scale sampling experience. Good results with store brands during these periods invariably breed consumer familiarity and then loyalty to the products and the stores that sell them. While some consumers do return to brands they bought before, many continue to buy their new private label choices. Consumer behavior and data from previous U.S. recessions bear this out.

While sales data, such as that published here in the PLMA 2011 Private Label Yearbook, offer an objective view of the status of store brands, consumer opinion surveys can provide supplemental insights. Based on the latest shopper study conducted for PLMA by GfK/Roper revealed, US consumers are giving strong signs they intend to stick with store brands.

A third of those polled reported that they are buying more store brands now compared to a year ago and over half describe themselves as frequent store brand shoppers. Half again said that they are more aware of store brands today than they were a year ago, and fully eight out of 10 believe that store brand products they buy are either equal to or better than national brands.

Share Print Reprints Permissions

What are your comments?

You cannot post comments until you have logged in. Login Here.

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments